Cases 1 - 10 of 296
Marshall v. Linter et al
as 6:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rickie Charles Marshall, Jr and Rickie Charles Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Clay Linter, Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay (PS) v. Colloi
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
Carleous Darrell Clay
Respondent:
Colloi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jefferson (ID 44578) v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jefferson
Defendant:
Leonard Moore, Austin Merz, Bryan Buchman and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Bryant et al
as 6:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Glenn Roberts
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood, Clay Lintner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasper v. Atwood et al
as 6:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nathan Robert Frank Kasper
Defendant:
Devra Atwood, Clay Linter, Jenny Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainer v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Sierra et al
as 2:2023cv00959
Plaintiff:
Cammi Rainer
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Sierra, Glenn Hamilton, Donald Clay Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Bryant et al
as 6:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Judson Todd Evans
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devin Atwood, Turnkey Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00342
Petitioner:
Ernest Clay Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
