Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Franklin v. Blanchard et al
as 1:2026cv00091
Plaintiff:
KHALID FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JUDGE GRADY BLANCHARD, GWENDOLYN BOVAN, Bobby L. Christine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. BLANCHARD et al
as 5:2026cv00172
Plaintiff:
KHALID FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JUDGE GRADY BLANCHARD, VETERANS CANTEEN SERVICES, GWENDOLYN BOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Conklin v. Jerry Leonard, et al
as 25-13031
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONKLIN
Defendant:
JERRY LEONARD, CODY ROSE, ADRIAN FREDERICKS and others
Bartlett v. Columbia County et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Defendant:
Sheriff Clay Whittle, Columbia County Sheriff's Office and Columbia County
Plaintiff:
Richard Joseph Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robert Gillespie v. Lt. S. Young, et al
as 24-12199
Defendant:
MELISSA REYNOLDS, DEPUTY MOSLEY, HUGH WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID GILLESPIE
Gillespie v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. S. Young, Deputy Smith, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillespie v. James et al
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Miss Crystie James, Miss Saint, Lt. S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conklin v. Leonard et al
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Michael Conklin
Defendant:
Jerry Leonard, Cody Rose, Adrian Fredericks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Geyser v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Officer Edward McClung, Jr., Sheriff Clay Whittle and Judge Carl C. Brown, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Geyser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin
as 1:2017cv00155
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, Clay Whittle, John Doe Major and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Conklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
