Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CLEARY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
SHAWNA L. CLEARY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SISK v. IMPD et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Defendant:
IMPD, INDIANAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL AUTHORITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00905
Defendant:
Crittendon, Brandon Williams, Austin Rupert and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogarty v. Wexford Medical Services et al
as 3:2021cv00129
Defendant:
Patel, John Galipeau, Jason Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Normand Fogarty
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERZ v. RIFKIN et al
as 1:2018cv02120
Defendant:
RICHARD SCHREINER, JONATHAN ADLAND, JOHN HANLEY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Konrath v. Cleary
as 3:2016cv00742
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Crysta Rae Cleary and Westville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konrath v. Cleary
as 3:2016cv00714
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Ms Cleary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konrath v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2016cv00705
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Tawna Sands, Christian Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Amsden et al
as 2:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jeffery Cleary and Clara Cleary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLEARY et al v. KETCHAM et al
as 1:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
MARK A. CLEARY and REBECCA CLEARY
Defendant:
DAVID L. KETCHAM and TRANSTEWART TRUCKING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
