Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Clement v. Kelly
as 1:2013cv00389
Petitioner:
Reginald Clement
Respondent:
Bennie Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clements v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23100
Plaintiff:
Gregory Clements
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements-Lemman et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23110
Plaintiff:
Theresa Clements-Lemman and Thomas Lemman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements v. Brimfield Township et al
as 1:2012cv01180
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jason Clements
Defendant:
Brimfield Township, Brimfield Township Police Department, David Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00803
Petitioner:
Joseph Danielle Clements
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Andera v. Tibbals
as 1:2011cv02606
Petitioner:
Clement Andera
Respondent:
Terry A. Tibbals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mabile et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22080
Plaintiff:
Clement Mabile and Gail Mabile
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Hospital Service District No. 1 of the Parish of Terrebonne, State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorcey et al v. Neal et al
as 2:2011cv00622
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Dorcey
Defendant:
Molly Clements, Chad Neal, Marcia Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. Warden London Correctional Institution
as 1:2011cv00442
Petitioner:
Bill David Clements
Respondent:
Warden London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
