Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 317
Rodenhizer et al v. Schoolcraft, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: Travis Rodenhizer, Betty Jo Conklin, Judith Anne Clifton and others
Defendant: Schoolcraft, County of, Jane Couwlier-Bridges and Julie B. Roscioli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
USA v. Dennis Epps
as 24-1350
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DENNIS CLIFTON EPPS
Bowman v. Chambless et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: Hywel C. Bowman
Defendant: Michael Chambless, Abby Cassady, Geoffrey Gleitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff: Clifton E. Beasley
Defendant: USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Craig v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff: Clifton D. Craig
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Plaintiff: Mary Clifton
Defendant: Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moncrief v. FedEx Coporation
as 2:2023cv02795
Plaintiff: Clifton Moncrief
Defendant: FedEx Coporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Contract Insurance
Dungee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03013
Plaintiff: Clifton Dungee
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clifton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02885
Plaintiff: Stacey Clifton
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roger Pierce v. Williams, et al
as 23-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROGER PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee: LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, SERGEANT . BURLERSON, OFFICER SMOLINSKI and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?