Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ferguson et al v. CMS Technology et al
as 5:2020cv05053
Plaintiff:
Joel Ferguson, Clinton Slate, Donnie Treat and others
Defendant:
CMS Technology, John Doe, Brainerd Chemical Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 20-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIMAR HOLDING COMPANY, LLC and CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC., dba CMS Technologies, Inc.
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
HEWLETT-PACKARD CO., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and LINKSYS LLC, fka Cisco Consumer Products LLC
Defendant:
3COM CORPORATION
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 20-1375
Defendant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., LINKSYS LLC, fka Cisco Consumer Products LLC and 3COM CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC., dba CMS Technologies, Inc. and CHRIMAR HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
HEWLETT-PACKARD CO.
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 20-1376
Defendant:
HEWLETT-PACKARD CO. and 3COM CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC., dba CMS Technologies, Inc. and CHRIMAR HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
LINKSYS LLC, fka Cisco Consumer Products LLC and CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Chrimar Systems, Inc., D/B/A CMS Technologies And Chrimar Holding Company, LLC v. VP Networks, Inc.,
as 2:2018mc51194
Plaintiff:
Chrimar Systems, Inc., D/B/A CMS Technologies And Chrimar Holding Company, LLC
Defendant:
VP Networks, Inc.
Chrimar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies et al v. Anixter Inc.
as 6:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Chrimar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC
Defendant:
Anixter Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Advanced Polymer v. Noveon Inc, et al
as 4:2001cv03594
Plaintiff:
Advanced Polymer Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Noveon Inc, CMS Technologies Inc, Kumar Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
