Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Nicholas Steinke v. Gerald Krueger, et al
as 21-2049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. STEINKE
Defendant / Appellee:
L. HANNON, GERALD KRUEGER, RICKY BRESELOW and others
Steinke v. Dittmann et al
as 2:2019cv00729
Defendant:
Robert Burdick, Beth Dittmann, Sgt Joseph Falke and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J Steinke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIDDLE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86364
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NANCY JO RIDDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEAY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86366
Defendant:
3M, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
ELLEN T. SEAY and ROBERT SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LADNER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86335
Defendant:
BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., OAKFABCO, INC., IMO INDUSTRIES and others
Plaintiff:
LLOYD J. LADNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCRANEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86348
Defendant:
AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MCCRANEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GISSENDANNER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86306
Defendant:
CRANE COMPANY, D.B. RILEY, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MAMIE GISSENDANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOLLISON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86297
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JUANITA DOLLISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FENNEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86301
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, CRANE COMPANY, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS JOSEPH FENNEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANNON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86395
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., VIACOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHIQUITA CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
