Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffman v. Roby
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oh Huff v. Casey County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Kumsook "Kim" Oh Huff and Kim
Defendant:
Casey County, Kentucky, Casey County Sheriff, Casey County Jailer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Coffman v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Pamula Coffman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jordan v. Connors et al
as 6:2020cv00164
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan and J.G. Shubazz
Defendant:
B. Root, Dr. C. Cunningham, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Mattmiller et al
as 5:2019cv00344
Defendant:
Chase Jones, Bullock & Coffman, LLP, M. Scott Mattmiller and others
Plaintiff:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Surles v. Root et al
as 6:2019cv00148
Defendant:
B. Root, T. Napier, J. Cima and others
Plaintiff:
Encines Felipe Surles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Modern Holdings, LLC, et al v Corning Incorporated, et al
as 5:2019cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Caldwell, Clyde Simpson, Steven Coffman and others
Defendant:
City of Danville Kentucky, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
