Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Osborn v. Coffman et al
as 3:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Steven Osborn
Defendant:
CEO Coffman and St. Joseph's Drug Rehab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PALUCH et al v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv00720
Defendant:
SGT. TYNER, GEORGE LITTLE, ERIC T. ARMEL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. and WILLIE M. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bookard v. Ellers et al
as 1:2021cv01569
Plaintiff:
Michael Bookard
Defendant:
Richard Ellers, Vernon Preston, Ethan Ernst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. TOSKI et al
as 2:2020cv01720
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant:
ZACHARY KODRIC, ROBERT SMITH, AMBER COFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainey v. Link et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Mr. Richard Ellers, Cynthia Link, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aul v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2018cv02142
Defendant:
Julie Chamberlain, Dr. Vernon Preston, Patrick Nagle and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Earl Aul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUZZO et al v. SPENCER et al
as 1:2018cv00107
Plaintiff:
ANN NUZZO and ALEX NUZZO
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER LUCCO, DAVID RAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROSIUS v. ABBOTT BUS LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2017mc00531
Plaintiff:
TYLER BROSIUS
Defendant:
ABBOTT BUS LINES, INC. , TRAILWAYS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INC. and JANICE COFFMAN
Movant:
PITTSBURGH PIRATES ACQUISITION, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
