Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Coleman-Taylor et al v. Multicare Health Systems
as 2:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Ms. Latoya Marie Coleman-Taylor, Mr Thomas Taylor, Latoya Marie Coleman-Taylor and others
Defendant:
MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEMS and Multicare Health Systems doing business as Good Samaritan Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goon v. Coleman et al
as 2:2018cv01445
Defendant:
Michael Coleman, Department of Corrections, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Goon and Michael D. Goon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gomez Maciel v. Coleman et al
as 2:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gomez Maciel
Defendant:
Mylissa Coleman and City of Spokane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampaga v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2016cv01310
Defendant:
Snohomish County , Mark Roe , The City of Everett and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Sampaga
Counter_claimant:
Mark Roe and Snohomish County
Counter_defendant:
Jason Sampaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01309
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Mark Roe, The City of Everett and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Sampaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
