Cases 1 - 10 of 83
GREENE v. COMM. OF PA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GREENE
Defendant:
COMM. OF PA PAROLE BOARD and S.C.I. GREENE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENE v. COMM. OF PA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GREENE
Defendant:
COMM. OF PA PAROLE BOARD and S.C.I. GREENE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE-BEY v. GOVERNOR OF PA et al
as 2:2017cv04292
Petitioner:
JASON GARY SPENCE-BEY
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF COMM, OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VILLANEVA v. COMM. OF PA. et al
as 2:2014cv06496
Petitioner:
RICKY VILLANEVA
Respondent:
COMM. OF PA., DEPT. OF CORR., JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cadmus v. Comm of PA et al
as 1:2012cv02335
Petitioner:
Norman Cadmus
Respondent:
Comm of PA and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendez v. City of Shennandoah et al
as 3:2011cv01476
Plaintiff:
Ruben Mendez
Defendant:
City of Shennandoah, Shennandoah Police Dept., Shenandoah Court System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ruben Valerio Mendez
Defendant:
Mark Sullivan, Schuykill County Prison (System) and Schuykill County Comm. of PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valerio-Mendez v. Munley et al
as 3:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ruben Valerio-Mendez
Defendant:
James M Munley, William Spencer Housel and Lackawanna County Comm. of PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Anthony v. Comm of PA, et al
as 11-1036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MORRIS ANTHONY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMM OF PA, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Jose Hernandez v. Comm of PA, et al
as 10-4624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MARIO HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMM OF PA and ATTY GEN PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
