Cases 21 - 30 of 1,905
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donna Conner v. Xfinity
as 24-1145
Plaintiff:
DONNA MARIE CONNER
Defendant:
XFINITY, United States General, ASSURANCE WIRELESS USA-LP, JASON S. MIYARES, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General and others
Spiker, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
George H. Spiker, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Propst v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Propst
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Susan Whitlock and Charles Propst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richard Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6077
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Artis Denard Johnson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richard Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6075
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Grasty v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Grasty
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minor v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Antoine L. Minor
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Emporia Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
