Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robin Lucas v. Rhonda Fleming
as 19-15176
Defendant / Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden, SHEILA YARBOROUGH, PETER M. CARLSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VALERIE MERCADEL, ROBIN LUCAS and RAQUEL DOUTHIT
Petitioner / Appellant:
RHONDA FLEMING, Proposed Intervenor
La'Ron Marshall v. Harley Lappin
as 11-6288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA'RON MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director of the BOP, K. M. WHITE, Mid-Atlantic Regional Dir., JAMES CROSS, Warden USP Hazelton and others
Mario Villabona-Alvarado v. Constance Reese
as 10-14985
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO E. VILLABONA-ALVARADO
Respondent - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden, FCI Talladega
Antoine Bruce v. Constance Reese, et al
as 10-14896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden, BECKY CLAY, Associate Warden, J. SAVIDGE, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-4264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walker v. Reese, et al
as 08-60994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN C WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, SCOTT FISHER, Associate Warden, Individual Capacity, ANTHONY CHAMBERS, Clinical Director, Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-3801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fulkerson v. Reese
as 08-60545
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ALDEN FULKERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden
Richardson v. Chambers, et al
as 08-60538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
A CHAMBERS, Health Services Director, VICKIE OWENS, Associate Health Services Director, MARY THOMAS, Assistant Health Services and others
Leidecker v. Reese
as 08-60107
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT LEIDECKER
Respondent - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
