Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Cortez Jr v. Trejo Jr et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Armando Cortez Jr
Defendant:
Glen Trejo Jr, Officer Ceja, Granger Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Amazon et al
as 2:2023cv01425
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Amazon, Jeffrey Preston Jorgensen, Andrew R Jassy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Warner Music Group et al
as 2:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Warner Music Group, Elana Caplan and Angela Caplan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Kathleen O'Toole, Lisa O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Virginia Mason
as 2:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Virginia Mason
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Sharecare et al
as 2:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Sharecare, Behavioral Health and Mendy Freeman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Lotte Hotels
as 2:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Lotte Hotels
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Wang et al
as 2:2023cv01299
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Alexander Wang and Versace
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Versace et al
as 2:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Versace, Alexander Wang, Vivian Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Satya Nadella, Bill Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
