Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Constance Andresen v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 22-2934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTANCE WILSON ANDRESEN
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY JACKSON, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON and others
Sawicki v. Kipphan et al
as 1:2021cv02031
Plaintiff:
Marianne Sawicki
Defendant:
Michael M. Kipphan, Lori Heaton, Richard A. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson Andresen v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2020cv00989
Defendant:
County of Huntingdon, Denise Watkins, Trooper Johnathan Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Constance Wilson Andresen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Gresh v. County of Huntingdon, et al
as 16-4272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS GRESH
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON, HUNTINGDON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC, BARTLEBAUGH AMUSEMENTS INC and others
Dennis Gresh v. County of Huntingdon, et al
as 16-3618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS GRESH
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON, HUNTINGDON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC, BARTLEBAUGH AMUSEMENTS INC and others
Corey Bracey v. County of Huntingdon, et al
as 15-3127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BRACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON, JUDGE STEWART L. KURTZ, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Maldanado v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv02249
Plaintiff:
Alexis Maldanado
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, S.C.I. Huntingdon, Tab Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKNIGHT v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2013cv02911
Petitioner:
ERNEST L. MCKNIGHT
Respondent:
TAB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BYERS v. BLACK et al
as 2:2008cv03718
Petitioner:
ROBERT T. BYERS
Respondent:
BLACK, HUNTINGDON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
