Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Trump, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 25-3034
Petitioner:
DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, RUSSELL VOUGHT and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
Amicus Curiae:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WALSH, ALAN CHARLES RAUL, BARBARA JEAN COMSTOCK and others
American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 25-3030
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, RUSSELL VOUGHT, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Office of Management and Budget and others
Amicus Curiae:
MARVIN HENRY EDWARDS, WILLIAM JOSEPH WALSH, ALAN CHARLES RAUL and others
Griffin v. County of Martin, Florida et al
as 2:2025cv14112
Plaintiff:
Theodore Keith Griffin
Defendant:
County of Martin, Florida, EDWARD L. BROCHU, SHERIFF John Michael Budensiek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lieffring v. Prairieland Solid Waste Facility et al
as 0:2019cv02812
Plaintiff:
James Lieffring
Defendant:
Prairieland Solid Waste Facility, County of Martin and County of Faribault
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
USA v. Quail Hollow Apartments, Ltd. et al
as 7:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Quail Hollow Apartments, Ltd., The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., County of Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
