Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch et al v. Double 00 Shitshow et al
as 4:2023cv03162
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch and Welch Racing LLC
Defendant:
Double 00 Shitshow, Lyle Barnett, Courtney Enders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch Racing LLC et al v. Barnett et al
as 4:2023cv03148
Plaintiff:
Welch Racing LLC and Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Lyle Barnett, David Wright, Courtney Enders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becker Hurd v. Bayless et al
as 8:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Susann Becker Hurd
Defendant:
Kadee Bayless and Courtney R. Gliem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Savage v. Frakes
as 4:2022cv03046
Petitioner:
Courtney J. Savage
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v. Frakes
as 4:2022cv03043
Petitioner:
Courtney J. Savage
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. PayPal Inc.
as 8:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Courtney Green
Defendant:
PayPal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lawton v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska et al
as 4:2021cv03162
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lawton
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, Hank Bounds and Ronnie Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
