Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Curley Boykin v. Carrie Hucklebridge, et al
as 16-10734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURLEY JAMES BOYKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PHILLIP, Senior Warden and ROLANDA WINFIELD, Assistant Warden
Curley Boykin v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20552
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURLEY JAMES BOYKIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Curley Boykin v. Carrie Hucklebridge, et al
as 14-11350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURLEY JAMES BOYKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELL PHILLIP, Senior Warden and ROLANDA WINFIELD, Assistant Warden
Boykin v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv01894
Petitioner:
Curley James Boykin
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boykin v. Bridge et al
as 3:2013cv04643
Plaintiff:
Curley James Boykin
Defendant:
Carrie Huckle Bridge, Lannette Linthicum, Michell Phillip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ari Bailey, et al v. American Correctional Assn, et al
as 10-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARI BAILEY
Plaintiff:
DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY, BRANDON SMALLS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DR., ASST. DIRECTOR CORR. PROG. DIV. and others
Ari Bailey, et al v. Harley G. Lappin, et al
as 10-2507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARI BAILEY
Plaintiff:
DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY, BRANDON SMALLS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DR., ASST. DIRECTOR CORR. PROG. DIV. and others
BAILEY et al v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, HARELY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY et al v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv01834
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER DUCKERY and others
Defendant:
HARELY G. LAPPIN, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
