Cases 21 - 28 of 28
CONNICK et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv02548
Plaintiff:
CORINNA CONNICK and MICHELLE VRENKO
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, LONGS DRUG STORE CORPORATION, The Kroger Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Simpson et al v. K-V Phamaceutical Company et al
as 3:2009cv00429
Plaintiff:
Curtis Simpson, Curtis Simpson, James Mayo and others
Defendant:
K-V Phamaceutical Company, Ethex Corporation, CVS Caremark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michigan, State of v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kmart Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lansing, City of et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00778
Plaintiff:
Lansing, City of, Dickinson Press Inc and Scott Murphy
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Long, Jr. v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 5:2009cv01392
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V Long, Jr.
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Rogow v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 2:2009cv10783
Plaintiff:
Emily Rogow
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walgreen Co. et al v. Caremark RX, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00744
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co. and others
Defendant:
Caremark RX, Inc., Caremark Rx, LLC, CaremarkPCS Alabama Mail Pharmacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kindred Healthcare, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
Kindred Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CaremarkPCS Health, L.P. and Caremark PCS Health Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
