Cases 11 - 20 of 63
v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2015at00707
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sherih Ibrahim v. CVS Rx Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06372
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Rx Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherih Ibrahim
Allen v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Allen
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and CVS Caremark Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WALTON v. THE CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN et al
as 1:2014cv01635
Defendant:
THE CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE WALTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2014cv01416
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2014at00681
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Le v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2014cv04779
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Thuy T. Le
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rosenberg v. Holiday CVS, LLC et al
as 0:2014cv61539
Plaintiff:
Mona Rosenberg
Defendant:
Holiday CVS, LLC , CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berkowitz v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv09045
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Berkowitz
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Caremark Corporation and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Marshen v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06660
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Marshen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
