Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Adams et al v. Bonneville Power Administration et al
as 6:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Carey Anderson, Karen Anderson and others
Defendant:
Bonneville Power Administration, Eugene Water and Electric Board, Lane Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
JONES v. SCHWARZ et al
as 3:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
GERRARD D JONES
Defendant:
SCHWARZ, MARK GOLDHAGEN, DENMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.
as 3:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
BILLY CHAD GIBSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL CREWS, RICHARD COMERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 3:2016cv00313
Plaintiff:
GERRARD D JONES
Defendant:
RICHARDSON , SZALAI, J STRAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Magwood v. Michael Crews, et al
as 15-12722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY L. MAGWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. CREWS, RICHARD COMERFORD, MARSHA NICHOLS and others
LOPEZ v. COMERFORD et al
as 3:2014cv00371
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LOPEZ
Defendant:
R COMERFORD, CYNTHIA COURTNEY, WILLIAM D RUMMELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAGWOOD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00314
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , RICHARD COMERFORD , MARSHA NICHOLS and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L MAGWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allbritton, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6297
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, WARREN BELL, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Allbritton, et al
as 13-0
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, WARREN BELL, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Allbritton, et al
as 13-615
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, MISTY DE GROAT, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
