Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 380
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00529
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Callier v. Direct 2 Home LLC
as 3:2024cv30005
Defendant: Direct 2 Home LLC, D, Bradley Pereira and others
Plaintiff: Brandon L Callier
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION et al v.DA COSTA NETO
as 1:2023cv02451
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: ROMERO CABRAL DA COSTA NETO
Cabrales v. Intellihartx, LLC
as OHN/3:23-CV-01439
Plaintiff: Cabrales
Defendant: Intellihartx, LLC
CABRAL v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P.
as 3:2023cv00162
Plaintiff: SERGIO CABRAL
Defendant: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Landwer v. Cabral et al
as 1:2023cv03679
Plaintiff: Charles H Landwer
Defendant: Fatima Cabral, Kimberlin Hernandez and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
King 1 Gourmet Deli Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 1:2023cv02006
Plaintiff: King 1 Gourmet Deli Inc., Altagracia Cabral Ortiz and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
USA v. Cabral-Aleman
as 23-50182
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Uriel Ignacio Cabral-Aleman

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?