Cases 1 - 10 of 281
Cadet v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 2:2024cv01320
Plaintiff:
Micanor Cadet
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Dew-Cadet v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02685
Plaintiff:
Callia Dew-Cadet
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brian Firebaugh, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1130
Petitioner:
Brian Firebaugh, Chloe Joy Sexton, Talia Cadet and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, in his capacity as United States Attorney General
Cadet v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01700
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cadet
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran and Strike Officer Hollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran, Strike Officer Hollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cadet v. Deputy et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
BabyLove Cadet
Defendant:
Hardman Edward Deputy and Camden County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cadet v. Alliance Nursing Staffing of New York, Inc.
as 24-315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERLY CADET, -
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLIANCE NURSING STAFFING OF NEW YORK, INC.
Veal v. MTD Products Company et al
as 1:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Robert Veal
Defendant:
MTD PRODUCTS COMPANY d/b/a CUB CADET, MTD PRODUCT, INC. d/b/a CUB CADET, CUB CADET, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
USA v. Wiggins Cadet
as 24-1176
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WIGGINS CADET, AKA Wiggins J. Cadet
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
