Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 23-2188
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BRUCE DAVIS, Warden and MICHAEL E. FARBIARZ
Caleb McGillvary v. James Galfy, et al
as 23-1816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES GALFY, Individually and as Executor/agent of the Estate of Joseph J. Galfy, III, ESTATE OF JOSEPH GALFY III, SCOTT M. PETERSON, Individually and in his official capacity and others
n v. Attorney General New Jersey, et alIn re: n v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-1773
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Caleb L. McGillvary et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Bunim Murray Productions, Jimmy Kimmel Live and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caleb L. McGillvary v. Theodor Vonkurnatowski
as 2:2022cv08587
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Theodor Vonkurnatowski
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
McGillvary v. Dorsey
as 3:2022cv05883
Plaintiff:
Caleb L McGillvary
Defendant:
Lamont Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 22-3068
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BRUCE DAVIS, Warden and MADELINE C. ARLEO
MCGILLVARY v. RIEZ et al
as 3:2022cv06430
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
RONALD RIEZ, SAMUAL LOPEZ, JOEL BERNHARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGillvary v. Grande
as 1:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Todd Grande
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
