Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02107
Petitioner:
CLARK CALLOWAY, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SALINAS et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2020cv02192
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE CALLOWAY and VICTOR SALINAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00686
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC. et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv03775
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER, T.J. SAMSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BARROCA et al v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv02740
Plaintiff:
MARK JORDAN, MANUEL GAUNA, JEREMY HAMMOND and others
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and HUGH J. HURWITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALLOWAY v. ZIMMER, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01943
Plaintiff:
EZRA C. CALLOWAY, SR.
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALLOWAY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02160
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA CALLOWAY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CALLOWAY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02159
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CALLOWAY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
