Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Barnard v. Boyd et al
as 1:2023cv00914
Plaintiff:
Brent Clifton Barnard
Defendant:
Calvin Boyd, LouAnn Armbruster and FNU Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Boyd
as 1:2023cv00915
Petitioner:
Aubrey Floyd Hart
Respondent:
Calvin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shane Villarino, et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., et al
as 23-10645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE VILLARINO, LAURA KAREN JOHNSON, JEFFERY MONDY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE, INC., PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA STAFFING SERVICE, INC. and others
Reece v. Lumbreras et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Plaintiff:
James Reece
Defendant:
Bert Lumbreras, Chris Marroquin, John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Diez v. Boyd
as 20-50961
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Logan Diez
Respondent / Appellee:
Sheriff Calvin Boyd, Burnet County
Diez v. Boyd
as 1:2020cv00819
Petitioner:
James Logan Diez
Respondent:
Sheriff Calvin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. Caraway et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
John Rathburn, Calvin Boyd, Mike Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villarino et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv60192
Defendant:
Pacesetter Personnel Service of Florida, Inc., Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., Florida Staffing Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Mondy, Shane Villarino, Laura J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Arteaga v. Burnet County Commissioners Court et al
as 1:2019cv00512
Defendant:
Calvin Boyd, Casie Walker and Burnet County Commissioners Court
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Arteaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boyd v. USA
as 5:2015cv00288
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CALVIN BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
