Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00971
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzales, et al. v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al.
as 25-2953
Plaintiff:
AMANDA GONZALES, NATALYA KASHIRINA, VIKALP AGRAWAL and others
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Hart v. Boyd
as 1:2023cv00915
Petitioner:
Aubrey Floyd Hart
Respondent:
Calvin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnard v. Boyd et al
as 1:2023cv00914
Plaintiff:
Brent Clifton Barnard
Defendant:
Calvin Boyd, LouAnn Armbruster and FNU Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shane Villarino, et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., et al
as 23-10645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE VILLARINO, LAURA KAREN JOHNSON, JEFFERY MONDY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE, INC., PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA STAFFING SERVICE, INC. and others
Reece v. Lumbreras et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Plaintiff:
James Reece
Defendant:
Bert Lumbreras, Chris Marroquin, John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Diez v. Boyd
as 20-50961
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Logan Diez
Respondent / Appellee:
Sheriff Calvin Boyd, Burnet County
Diez v. Boyd
as 1:2020cv00819
Petitioner:
James Logan Diez
Respondent:
Sheriff Calvin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. Caraway et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
John Rathburn, Calvin Boyd, Mike Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
