Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Campbell v. Epstin et al
as 2:2021cv00457
Defendant:
James Palmer, Tao Epstin, Eric Pendelton and others
Plaintiff:
George Irving Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company et al
as 2:2017cv03391
Plaintiff:
Michael V Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company, Corizon LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, Lucy Burciaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Lucy Burciaga, Tracy Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Tony L Horton
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Richard L Richards
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderso Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Ryder Services Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv01778
Plaintiff:
Calvin Johnson
Defendant:
Ryder Services Corporation and ATE Management & Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Valenzuela-Sanchez v. Johnson
as 4:2015cv00383
Petitioner:
Jesus Martin Valenzuela-Sanchez
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Phoenix, City of
as 2:2015cv00727
Plaintiff:
Calvin Johnson
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
