Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wright et al v. Cummins Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10496
Plaintiff: Bruce S Wright and Louise K Wright
Cross Claimant: Cummins Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., IMO Industries Inc. and others
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to The Cooper-Bessemer Corporation, Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: General Electric Company, ITT LLC, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff: Robert J Gillis
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant: Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party: Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court: Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Myrna Abril v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff: Myrna Abril, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Vicente Abril, Deceased and Myrna Abril
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Atwood & Morrill as Successor-in-Interest to Weir Valves and Controls USA Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Marcia Vanover v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff: MARCIA VANOVER, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of DAVID VANOVER, Deceased and Marica Vanover
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., A.O. Smith Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. and Pneumo Abex LLC
Cross Defendant: Kohler, Co., Sid Harvey Industries Inc. and York International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Bayou La Batre Utilities Board v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00273
Plaintiff: Bayou La Batre Utilities Board
Defendant: BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Dauphin Island Property Owners Association v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00271
Plaintiff: Dauphin Island Property Owners Association
Defendant: BP Exploration & Production, Inc., Moex, BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
The Town of Dauphin Island, Alabama v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00261
Plaintiff: The Town of Dauphin Island, Alabama
Defendant: BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
The City of Bayou La Batre, Alabama v. BP Exploration and Production, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00260
Plaintiff: The City of Bayou La Batre, Alabama
Defendant: BP Exploration and Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Baldwin County, Alabama v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00256
Plaintiff: Baldwin County, Alabama
Defendant: BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Mobile County, Alabama v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00255
Plaintiff: Mobile County, Alabama
Defendant: BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?