Cases 1 - 10 of 1,059
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Karen S. Campbell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Frances Campbell v. Revlon, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv02780
Plaintiff:
FRANCES CAMPBELL
Defendant:
REVLON, INC.,, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Campbell v. County of Vanderburgh, et al
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY, INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STANLEY LEVCO and others
CAMPBELL v. CASEY'S MARKETING COMPANY d/b/a CASEY'S
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CASEY'S MARKETING COMPANY d/b/a CASEY'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Anthony-El v. Durban et al
as 3:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Javier Anthony-El
Defendant:
. Durban, Major Stevens, Reid Cerutti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Campbell v. County of Vanderburgh, et al
as 24-8008
Petitioner:
DAVID JOHN CAMPBELL
Respondent:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY, INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STANLEY LEVCO and others
Z.W. v. Gerber Products Company et al
as 1:2024cv02379
Plaintiff:
Z.W.
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Nestle S.A., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
