Cases 1 - 10 of 246
JWC et al v. Camden Clark Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00496
Defendant:
Camden Clark Memorial Hospital, Inc., Auxillary of the Camden Clark Memorial Hospital of Parkersburg, Inc., Camden-Clark Physician Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
J. W. C., Austin Campbell and Tierra Frieson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Campbell et al v. Uptowner Inns, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Steven Campbell and Susan Campbell
Defendant:
Uptowner Inns, Inc. doing business as Coco View Resort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Campbell v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00360
Petitioner:
Joseph Corey Campbell
Respondent:
Warden E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Campbell v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
Pierre A. Campbell
Respondent:
Warden C. Maruka and Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boardman v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00006
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Bruce Lee Boardman
Interested Party:
Gregory J. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gowans v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Bruce Campbell Gowans, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gladney v. Campbell
as 2:2019cv00500
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gladney
Defendant:
Jeffery Campbell and Madison Campbell
Not Yet Classified:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Warden
as 1:2018cv01361
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Pierre Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Leslie et al
as 5:2018cv00357
Plaintiff:
David Atreyel Campbell
Defendant:
Leslie, Sweeney, Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
