Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Gresham #272603 v. Awomolo et al
as 1:2024cv00242
Defendant:
A. Awomolo, Double A, Unknown Shembarger and others
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Allen v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2023cv12178
Plaintiff:
Candy Fay Allen
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Owens #829102 v. Briske et al
as 1:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Jarmal Owens #829102
Defendant:
Addie Briske, Candi Mason, Jack Bellinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens #829102 v. Briske et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Defendant:
Candi Mason, Unknown Dankfert, Addie Briske and others
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Jarmal Owens #829102
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouser #822775 v. Mason
as 1:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
Khiry Rouser #822775
Defendant:
Candi M. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gleason et al v. Bronson Healthcare Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00379
Plaintiff:
Susan Gleason and Candi Gabrielse
Defendant:
Bronson Healthcare Group, Inc., John Does 1-30, Board of Directors of Bronson Healthcare Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bock #520205 v. Michigan Department of Corrections Health Service Operations et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
N. Monroe, Unknown Danker, Michigan Department of Corrections Health Service Operations and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Bock #520205
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Workman v. Priority Health Managed Benefits, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Plaintiff:
Candy Workman
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) and Priority Health Managed Benefits, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
