Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Mulder v. Girling et al (MAG +)
as 2:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Julius Littleton Mulder
Defendant:
Dr. Girling, The County of Elmore, Warden Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Elmore County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Mitchell
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Sgt. Heard, Bill Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
David Mims
Defendant:
James Glenn Goggans, Tracy Jackson, Captain Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00548
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Coleman, Sr.
Defendant:
Tracy Jackson and Captain Tuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00496
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Hill
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Warden Estes, Deputy Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Roderick Wright
Defendant:
Tracy Jackson, Warden Estes, Deputy Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puig-Llanes v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Enmanuel Puig-Llanes
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Warden Estes, Deputy Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vreeland v. Jackson et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
Chad Vreeland
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Deputy Lowry, Captain Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Dennis
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Chief Deputy Lowry, Captain Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Captain Tuck, Chief Deputy Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
