Cases 1 - 10 of 29
CARD v. Antonelli
as 3:2020cv00170
Petitioner:
CHARLES CARD
Respondent:
Bryan Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2020cv00176
Petitioner:
CHARLES CARD
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Card v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07513
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Card
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $1,900.00 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$1,900.00 in United States Currency, $1,820.00 in United States Currency, $5,441.00 in United States Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Arneault et al v. Brnilovich et al
as 5:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ted Arneault , Patrick Arneault , ORCA Outdoors, LLC and others
Defendant:
Melissa Brnilovich, Barclays Bank Delaware , PNC Bank, National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leibelson v. Samuels, et. al.
as 5:2015cv12863
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Leibelson
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Louis C. Eichenlaub, John F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Carnell et al
as 5:2015cv12525
Plaintiff:
Everette Scott
Defendant:
William Carnell, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joel Coakley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. RCS Recovery Services LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. White
Defendant:
RCS Recovery Services LLC , FIA Card Services, Wells Fargo Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Card v. Coloplast Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv23729
Plaintiff:
Linda Card
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp., C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
