Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
S.L. v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
S.L.
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Officer Daniel Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Adolfo Cardenas v. City of Santa Maria et al
as 2:2023cv10146
Plaintiff:
ADOLFO CARDENAS
Defendant:
City of Santa Maria, Andy Brice and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Avondale, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Keitha Tucker
Defendant:
Avondale, City of, Cardenas Duarte, Unknown Duarte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mao Cardenas et al v. County of Ventura, et al
as 2:2023cv05482
Plaintiff:
Mao Cardenas and Estate of Tomoko Hoetzlein
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VENTURA,, Sevet Johnson, CITY OF CAMARILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
