Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Armstrong v. A+ Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02040
Plaintiff:
Kalea Armstrong
Defendant:
A+ Care Solutions, Inc. and Antonio White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Woods v. A+ Care Solutions, Inc., et al.
as 2:2017cv02045
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Woods
Defendant:
A+ Care Solutions, Inc. and Antonio White
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Pew v. Keldie et al
as 3:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Carl Keldie, Correct Care Solutions, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Percy Pew
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenleaf v. A + Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01185
Plaintiff:
Sofiea S. Greenleaf
Defendant:
A + Care Solutions, Inc. and Antonio White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Melton et al v. VIP Home Nursing & Rehabilitation Service, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00691
Plaintiff:
Renee Nicole Melton and Tammy S. Paulus
Defendant:
VIP Home Nursing & Rehabilitation Service, LLC, CareAll, Inc., CareAll, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson et al v. State of Tennessee's Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00193
Plaintiff:
Annette Jackson and Pearlie Mae Dunigan
Defendant:
State of Tennessee's Tennessee Department of Corrections, Correct Care Solutions Inc. and West Tennessee State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ingram v. Hall et al
as 3:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Ingram
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Austin Bodie, Correct Care Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ingram v. Hall et al
as 3:2009mc00004
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Ingram
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Austin Bodie, Correct Care Solutions, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
