Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Taylor et al v. JBS Foods USA et al
as 3:2023cv03031
Plaintiff:
Tim Taylor and Bryce Baker
Defendant:
JBS Foods USA, Tyson Foods, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Thornton, et al v. Tyson Foods, et al
as 20-2124
Defendant / Appellee:
TYSON FOODS, INC., JBS USA FOOD COMPANY, CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS, CORP. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBIN G. THORNTON and MICHAEL LUCERO, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Barbosa v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
as 1:2011at00088
Plaintiff:
Christina Barbosa
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Barbosa v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
as 1:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Christina Barbosa and Patricia Aguillera Barrios
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Sieben v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
as 0:2009cv03447
Plaintiff:
William R. Sieben, William R. Sieben, William R. Sieben and others
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type:
Other Statutes
Alton Terry v. Tyson Farms, Inc.
as 08-5577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON T. TERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
TYSON FARMS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP., NATIONAL CHICKEN COUNSEL and others
Wheeler, et al v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp
as 07-40651
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CODY WHEELER, DON DAVIS and DAVEY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellant:
PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORP
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL, AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE and others
:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION and OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
