Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bond v Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2018cv01466
Petitioner:
Carl Bond
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOND v. GODWIN
as 4:2018cv00417
Petitioner:
CARL BOND
Respondent:
GODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bond v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv01043
Petitioner:
Carl Bond
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bond, Jr. et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01332
Plaintiff:
Carles Bond, Jr. and Susan Bond
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Braz et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01661
Plaintiff:
Jose Braz , Mary Griffey , Bonnie Lightsey and others
Petitioner:
Vincent Williams
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and others
Bond et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01778
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Bond, Sr. and Maryanne Bond
Bond et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01778
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Bond, Sr. and Maryanne Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
