Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Evans v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv18572
Plaintiff:
Carl Evans
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03613
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARL EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17062
Plaintiff:
CARL EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Evans et al
as 2:2019cv00697
Plaintiff:
Johnnye Lee Davis
Defendant:
Heartland Express, Inc., Carl Evans and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv07106
Plaintiff:
Carl Evans
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10341
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
CARL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON, et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al
as 3:2017cv07924
Plaintiff:
KAREN THOMPSON , JAMIE ALLEN , SHAY AMBURN and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Plaintiff_consolidated:
JoAnn LaVerde Crucio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01654
Plaintiff:
Karen Thompson , Jamie Allen , Shay Amburn and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC
as 1:2016cv01040
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Evans and Carl Evans
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
