Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DRUCKER v. ENGLISH et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff: CARL J. DRUCKER, II
Defendant: ENGLISH, WELLINGTON, TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRUCKER v. RIGGS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00334
Defendant: BYRD, BOBBI RIGGS, RAGOLI and others
Plaintiff: CARL J. DRUCKER, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donley v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00047
Plaintiff: Carl J. Donley
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Donley v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00430
Plaintiff: Carl J. Donley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kennedy v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00602
Plaintiff: Carl J Kennedy
Defendant: Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRIZZI
as 1:2017mc00024
COOPER v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff: CARL J. COOPER, JR.
Defendant: EVANSVILLE, INDIANA and VANDERBURGH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATKINS v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv00443
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: CARL J. WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Donley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00352
Plaintiff: Carl J Donley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MIMMS v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv00950
Defendant: ABDUL ENTALLABY and SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Plaintiff: CARL J. MIMMS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?