Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Tate v. Moore et al
as 1:2012cv01402
Plaintiff:
Carl Tate
Defendant:
. Moore, . Bowden, . Vickers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jackson , Tawanda Jackson , Bernadette Landry and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jackson , All Plaintiffs , Tawanda Jackson and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carl Tate v. Guy Pierce
as 10-3280
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL TATE
Respondent - Appellee:
GUY PIERCE
Tate v. Gerst et al
as 3:2010cv00661
Plaintiff:
Carl Tate
Defendant:
Gerst, Schwartz and Michael Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00658
Plaintiff:
Carl Tate
Defendant:
Davis, Heck, Michael Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Noack et al
as 4:2010cv01978
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
E. Allan Noack, R. Carl Tate and Hot Spot Bar of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Tate v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv01704
Petitioner:
Carl Tate
Respondent:
Randy Davis and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. McCann et al
as 1:2008cv05664
Plaintiff:
Carl Tate
Defendant:
Terry L McCann, Ronald J Meek, Roger E Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tate v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv09042
Plaintiff:
Carl Tate
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company, Scottsdale Insurance Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
