Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Isom Jr. et al v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2024cv03236
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Isom Jr., Elite Clientele LLC and Isom and Sole Inc.
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, Mayor Tiffany Henyard, Inspector Kim Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MORETT CARLISLE v. RICH
as 1:2023cv01891
Plaintiff:
PEGGY DIANE MORETT CARLISLE
Defendant:
CONNOR RICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ASH v. ROTHENBERG et al
as 1:2021cv02534
Plaintiff:
CASSIUS ASH
Defendant:
MARC ROTHENBERG, CARLISLE, VICKY NEIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stone v. Whitt
as 3:2018cv00962
Plaintiff:
Kiel Stone
Defendant:
Ron Whitt, Indiana Law Enforcement Academy, Town of New Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARLISLE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv03536
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE MILTON CARLISLE, II
Defendant:
HAMILTON SUPERIOR COURT 5 and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddey v. LaPorte City of et al
as 3:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
William Gaddey
Defendant:
LaPorte City of , LaPorte County Sheriff and Town of New Carlisle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Indiana State Police et al
as 3:2016cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kiel Richard Stone
Defendant:
Indiana State Police, St Joseph County Sheriffs/Police Department, South Bend Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
