Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
FREGOSO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13477
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS B FREGOSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45494
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS B MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singleton v. Cooks
as 1:2019cv00505
Respondent:
Mary Cooks
Petitioner:
Carlos B. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vielma et al v. Gruler et al
as 6:2018cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jose Vielma , Carmen Nilda Capo-Quinones , Bernedette Cruz and others
Defendant:
Adam Todd Gruler , John Does 1-20, John Does 21-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee et al v. Epic Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv60646
Plaintiff:
Richard Magee , Andrew Carofano , Amanda Fletcher and others
Defendant:
Epic Restaurant Group, Inc. and Danielle Rosse
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Reliford v. Hill
as 3:2016cv00088
Petitioner:
Carlo B. Reliford
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Defendant:
Tamala Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reliford v. Hill
as 1:2016cv00196
Petitioner:
CARLO B RELIFORD
Respondent:
CHRIS HILL and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reliford v. Hill
as 4:2016cv00059
Petitioner:
Carlo B. Reliford
Respondent:
Chris Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolfe v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00594
Plaintiff:
Carlos B. Wolfe
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
