Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Graham v. DDDE Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01559
Plaintiff:
Dandra Graham
Defendant:
Carlos Duarte-Javier and DDDE Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cason et al v. Carroll et al
as 2:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sandra Cason , Sandra Chau , Robert Connors and others
Defendant:
Edward Carroll and Mark Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duarte-Vasquez v. USA
as 1:2017cv00486
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Waters et al v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00847
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Caroline Waters , Antohony Mitchell , Joyce Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Duarte v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv01910
Plaintiff:
Carlos Duarte
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maldonado-Pagan v. Negron-Fernandez
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIANO MALDONADO-PAGAN
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. ORTIZ-HADDOCK, VICENTE GARCIA-GONZALEZ, AUGUSTUS CHRISTOPHER LIND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE R. NEGRON FERNANDEZ, Administrator of the Juvenile Institution Administration and CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION
Duarte et al v. North and South Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv20310
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DUARTE , JOSE ALVARADA , Cesar Hernandez and others
Defendant:
North and South Construction, LLC and Racson Iglesias
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Duarte et al v. BJ Construction Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv11590
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Duarte , Jesus Duarte and Eduardo Duarte
Defendant:
BJ Construction Group, LLC and Justin S Fara
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
