Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03108
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Harned v. US
as 16-6733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH V. HARNED
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN SARA M. REVELL, ASSOCIATE WARDEN CAMPOS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BUTNER FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Gregory Baker v. US
as 15-7262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY EARL BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WARDEN STEPHENS, in her personal capacity, ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his personal capacity, A. W. CAMPOS, in his personal capacity and others
Charles Barefoot, Jr. v. Nurse Derry
as 12-6875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN GATON and RICHARD DANIEL HONEYCUTT
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE DERRY, DOCTOR GONZALEZ, OFFICER HILL and others
Defendant:
CAMPOS, SARAH REVELL, Warden and WARDEN BEELER
David Brinkley v. The United State
as 12-6176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EUGENE BRINKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROSCOE RAMSEY, Doctor, CARLOS DUCHESNE, Doctor and others
Brinkley v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2010ct03084
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Brinkley
Defendant:
The United States of America, Roscoe Ramsey, Carlos Duchesne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barefoot et al v. Derry et al
as 5:2009ct03143
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Christian Gaton and Richard Daniel Honeycutt
Defendant:
Nurse Derry, Dr. Gonzalez, Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
