Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ortiz-Pagan v. Hartye et al
as 1:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ortiz-Pagen and Carlos Ortiz-Pagan
Defendant:
Joseph F. Hartye, Judge William T. Tully and Mary Klatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jaimes v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv02009
Plaintiff:
Charlie Jaimes
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Carlos Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz et al v. Martinez et al
as 1:2016cv09182
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ortiz and Wilson Cabrera
Defendant:
Hamid Beltre , Derek Martinez and John Does#1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b Fed. Question: Bivens Act
Morales v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2016cv00773
Plaintiff:
Silvia Morales
Defendant:
Carlos Ortiz and Other Unknown Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center et al
as 2:2016cv02195
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Bailey
Defendant:
Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center and Carlos Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Fernandez-Jorge et al v. Galarza-Soto et al
as 3:2014cv01590
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Fernandez-Jorge and Carmen Lidia Jorge
Defendant:
Julio Galarza-Soto and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres-Vega et al v. Administracion de Correccion et al
as 3:2014cv01015
Plaintiff:
Hector Jaime Torres-Vega
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion, Roberto Del Valle, Miguel A. Caban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
