Cases 1 - 10 of 20
TAPIA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05757
Plaintiff:
CARLOS TAPIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arbelaez v. Electronic Interface Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Hans Arbelaez and Carlos Tapia
Defendant:
Electronic Interface Associates, Inc., EIA Electric, Inc., EIA Electrical Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Martinez v. Tapia et al
as 2:2022cv01824
Plaintiff:
Ruben Martinez
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Tapia an Arizona company doing business as Zero's Barber Shop, Juan Carlos Tapia and Gisela Tapia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tapia v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2022cv01576
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tapia
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Lorie Cunningham and Mark Litherland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia-Zazueta v. Garland
as 22-1068
Petitioner:
CARLOS TAPIA-ZAZUETA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Michael R. Spengler v. LA Superior Court et al
as 2:2021cv06051
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Defendant:
LA Superior Court, Judge Carlos Tapia and Judge Henry Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tapia v. Pittman et al
as 3:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tapia
Defendant:
Ms. Cunningham and Lynn Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAPIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54228
Plaintiff:
CARLOS TAPIA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia et al v. Sal 79 Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01301
Plaintiff:
Julio Tellez Garcia, Carlos Tapia, Cesar Tello Vargas and others
Defendant:
Salvatore Coppola, Kenny Kaiser, Salvatore's Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00170
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
