Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60747
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GREEN v. DUETZ et al
as 3:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
CARMEN D GREEN
Defendant:
DUETZ and JASON WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Puentes v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07759
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Revlon, Inc., AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen D. Puentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IN LUX RESEARCH et al v. HULL MCGUIRE PC et al
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
IN LUX RESEARCH and LINDSAY OLSON
Defendant:
HULL MCGUIRE PC, JOHN DANIEL HULL, DAVID B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Soto Rios v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 8:2022cv01089
Plaintiff:
Carmen D. Soto Rios
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Soto Rios v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Carmen D. Soto Rios
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Valentin et al v. BCPeabody Construction Services LLC
as 3:2021cv01282
Plaintiff:
MANUEL NAZARIO, ROBERTO DIEPPA, JOSE LLANOS and others
Defendant:
BCPeabody Construction Services LLC, John Doe and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
VALENTIN et al
as 3:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
MANUEL NAZARIO, ROBERTO DIEPPA, JOSE LLANOS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
