Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rodriguez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01591
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez et al v. Sabrosas Empanadas Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv07876
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sabrosas Empanadas Corp. doing business as Empanada Monumental and Yokasta Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Rodriguez v. CVS Albany, LLC
as 1:2022cv05298
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rodriguez
Defendant:
CVS Albany, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rodriguez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of SSA Decision DIWW - Title II Widow or Widower Claims
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00432
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00327
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodriguez v. Barr
as 20-2203
Petitioner:
Rocio Del Carmen Rodriguez
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Rebasti et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11532
Plaintiff:
Susan Sanchez, Julietta Sainovic, Kathleen Ruane and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Rodriguez v. Services for the Underserved, Inc.
as 1:2018cv09445
Defendant:
Services for the Underserved, Inc.
Plaintiff:
CARMEN RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 a
Rodriguez De Carrasco v. Life Care Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05617
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rodriguez De Carrasco
Defendant:
Life Care Services, Inc., Roselyn Zelman and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
