Cases 11 - 20 of 33
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY D/B/A PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS, INC. v. City of Jacksonville, Florida et al
as 5:2009cv00037
Plaintiff:
Carolina Power & Light Company
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Florida and Koch Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carolina Power & Light Company et al v. Aspect Software, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv00449
Plaintiff:
Carolina Power & Light Company, Florida Power Corporation d/b/a Progress Energy Florida, Inc. and Progress Energy Service Company, LLC
Defendant:
Aspect Software, Inc. and Bellsouth Communications Systems, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT V US
as 08-5108
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Carolina Power & Light Company and Florida Power Corporation
Defendant-Appellant:
United States
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. Albemarle Electric Membership Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel., WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR., SECRETARY, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant:
Albermarle Electric Membership Corporation, Berkeley Electric Cooperative, Inc., Black River Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. Progress Engery Inc et al
as 2:2007cv04956
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P
Defendant:
Progress Engery Inc, Carolina Power & Light Company, Progress Energy Service Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Progress Energy, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00202
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.
Defendant:
Progress Energy, Inc., Carolina Power & Light Company, Progress Energy Service Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation
as 2:2007ml01816
Defendant:
Carolina Power & Light Company, Citizens Communications, Time Warner Cable Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc., Xerox Global Services Inc and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation, Intervoice Inc and Aspect Communications Corporation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Macy's Inc, Bloomingdale's Inc, FDS Bank and others
Counter Claimant:
21st Century Casualty Company, Randall's Food Markets Inc, DIRECTV Holding, LLC and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn and Bernard H Chao
Petitioner:
Target Corporation, Target Bank, Robert Cohn and others
Cross Defendant:
International Business Machines Corp
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER V US
as 07-5083
Amicus Curiae:
Alabama Power Company, Arizona Public Service Company, Boston Edison Company and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Nebraska Public Power District
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC:
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY et al v. USA
as 1:2004cv00037
Plaintiff:
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY and FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
St NY, et al v. EPA
as 02-1387
Petitioner:
State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Maine and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
NSR Manufacturers Roundtable, Clean Air Implementation Project, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
American Petroleum Institute, Utility Air Regulatory Group, Illinois State Chamber of Commerce and others
Terminated Party:
National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Regulatory Project
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Clean Air Trust, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jon S. Corzine and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
State of Florida
Amicus Curiae:
James M. Inhofe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
