Cases 41 - 50 of 346
Glass v. Carr
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Attorney General Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Butler v. Georgia Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv04890
Petitioner:
De'Carlos Bobby Butler
Respondent:
Georgia Department Of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia (Christopher M. Carr)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv04646
Plaintiff:
Charles Fitzgerald Davis
Defendant:
Christopher M. Carr, Georgia Attorney General and Georgia Dept. of Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Wyatt v. Wood et al
as 4:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Patrick Timothy Wyatt
Defendant:
Jon Bolling Wood, Herbert E. Buzz Franklin, Kim Windle James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantrell v. Carr
as 4:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Yusef Cantrell
Defendant:
Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Adams et al
as 1:2022cv04408
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Clarke
Defendant:
Kimberly M. Esmond Adams, Fani T. Willis, Cathelene Tina Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Slack v. Eaton et al
as 1:2022cv04347
Plaintiff:
Danmond Jonathan Slack
Defendant:
Charles M. Eaton, Jr., Fani T. Willis, Cathelene "Tina" Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plez v. Toby
as 1:2022cv04291
Petitioner:
Chinua Plez and Chinva Plez
Respondent:
Annetia Toby and Christoper M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
